Skip to main content
· 6/15/2005

Sprague v. Household International

Citations

  • 473 F. Supp. 2d 966
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11694
  • 2005 WL 5155253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Under Missouri law, “[i]f an unenforceable term is not essential to the entire agreement, then the rest of the agreement may be enforced.”
  • company has not explained why confidentiality agreements provide any real benefit, much less a comparable benefit, to the consumer and, as repeat players, the company is the obvious beneficiary of any attempt to obscure the process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laughrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.