· 6/15/2005
Sprague v. Household International
Citations
- 473 F. Supp. 2d 966
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11694
- 2005 WL 5155253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Under Missouri law, “[i]f an unenforceable term is not essential to the entire agreement, then the rest of the agreement may be enforced.”
- company has not explained why confidentiality agreements provide any real benefit, much less a comparable benefit, to the consumer and, as repeat players, the company is the obvious beneficiary of any attempt to obscure the process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Laughrey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.