Sprague v. California Pacific Bankers & Insurance Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Djealing with assignment of a claim, this court focused on the damages requested—in that ease, damages for injury to the commercial credit and general reputation of a business that was allegedly forced into bankruptcy.”
• “It is within the appellate court’s discretion whether to recognize points not presented in accordance with HRAP Rule 28(b)(4).”
• “The ICA’s decision to disregard this point on appeal did not amount to grave error, inasmuch as the Petitioners’ points of error section failed to comply with HRAP Rule 28(b)(4).” (emphasis added)
• “In this case, similar to Austin, the damages sought for injury to the commercial credit and reputation of Kona Aviation were personal and unassignable.... Similarly, the damages sought for loss of business opportunities were personal and unassignable.... ”
• “District courts have ‘inherent power’ to control their dockets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).