Spradling v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute almost identical to Section 56-5-1340, as amended, held to make privileged only “the written reports required to be made in compliance with the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stepney
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-30· cited 222×
• Spradling v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-21· cited 92×
• Spradling v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1982-06-09· cited 13×
• Stephens v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-05-08· cited 11×
• Ellison v. Pope
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-08-18· cited 5×
• Stephen v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-05-08· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daniels v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-05-14· cited 128×
• Stone v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-30· cited 106×
• Goss v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-23· cited 78×
• Martin v. Jenkins
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1964-06-22· cited 17×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-02· cited 6×