Spradlin v. Spradlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that citation to a single case with no argument as to how that case supports the appellant's contention on appeal was insufficient to satisfy Rule 28(a)(5), Ala.R.App.P., now Rule 28(a)(10), Ala.R.App.P.
• explaining that an appellate court is not required to do a party's legal research or to develop an argument on behalf of a party
• explaining that an appellate court is not required to do a party's legal research or to develop an argument on behalf of a party
• this Court \cannot create legal arguments for a party based on undelineated general propositions unsupported by authority or argument\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).