Skip to main content
· 12/7/2000

Spradlin v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.

Citations

  • 34 S.W.3d 578
  • 44 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 158
  • 2000 Tex. LEXIS 102
  • 2000 WL 1784608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that statutory language should not be construed in a manner rendering words useless or a nullity
  • stating that an entire statute is presumed to be effective and no words should be read as useless or a nullity
  • stating that we must give effect to all words of a statute and not treat any statutory language as surplusage if possible
  • stating that courts rely on the constitution's literal text and construe its words as they are generally understood
  • stating that presuming the constitutional language is carefully selected, its words must be construed as they are generally understood
  • stating thatpresumingthe constitutional language is carefully selected, its words must be construed as they are generally understood

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.