Spotz v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “non-waivable, statutorily mandated costs are deductible absent any express court order”
• noting that “non-waivable, statutorily mandated costs are deductible absent any express court order”
• noting that “non-waivable, statutorily mandated costs are deductible absent any express court order”
• noting trial court lacked jurisdiction over challenges to the “governmental actions of [the clerk of courts] and [the Department of Corrections]”
• “Even though the [DC-300B commitment form] was completed on the court’s behalf by the clerk and was not signed by the sentencing judge, the Department did not err in relying on that form[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).