Skip to main content
· 5/12/1994

Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 24 F.3d 1390
  • 16 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1161
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10541
  • 1994 WL 178548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because the specific primary purpose was distinct from the essential characteristics of the listed exemplars, ejusdem generis classification is improper
  • “The trial court concluded that when determining the classification of the merchandise at issue here, under a proper analysis, the focus should be on whether food or beverage is involved. We agree.”
  • similar for pre-HTSUS heading of Tariff Schedule of the United States (TSUS)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Plager, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.