· 5/12/1994
Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 24 F.3d 1390
- 16 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1161
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10541
- 1994 WL 178548
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- because the specific primary purpose was distinct from the essential characteristics of the listed exemplars, ejusdem generis classification is improper
- “The trial court concluded that when determining the classification of the merchandise at issue here, under a proper analysis, the focus should be on whether food or beverage is involved. We agree.”
- similar for pre-HTSUS heading of Tariff Schedule of the United States (TSUS)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rich, Plager, Rader
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.