Sports Design and Development, Inc. v. Schoneboom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding standards are the same for a TRO or preliminary injunction, citing S.B. McLaughlin & Co. v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project, 877 F.2d 707, 708 (8th Cir.1989
• concluding standards are the same for a TRO or preliminary injunction, citing S.B. McLaughlin & Co. v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project, 877 F.2d 707, 708 (8th Cir.1989
• finding that restraining order would not prevent defendant from producing or selling other types of fishing lures or- otherwise conducting business weighed in favor of granting the order
• finding this factor involves balancing interest in protecting public from confusion with interest of facilitating a competitive market
• finding “ ‘plaintiff bears the burden of proof concerning the four factors.’ ”
• finding “ ‘plaintiff bears the burden of proof concerning the four factors.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).