Sportmart, Inc. v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that coverage is required for all bodily injury arising out of, growing out of, or resulting from Daisy’s product
• holding that coverage is required for all bodily injury arising out of, growing out of or resulting from Daisy’s product
• holding that coverage is required for all bodily injury arising out of, growing out of, or resulting from Daisy’s product
• no estoppel where insured did not allege it was prejudiced by fact that it initiated declaratory judgment action
• no estoppel where insured did not allege it was prejudiced by fact that it initiated declaratory judgment action
• coverage provided where vendor negligently sold named insured’s BB pellets to minor, who sustained eye injury when he shot pellets from BB gun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).