Skip to main content
· 11/26/1913

Spokane Casket Co. v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 76 Wash. 425
  • 136 P. 481
  • 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1832

Syllabus

<p>Damages — Duty to Minimize — Evidence. In an action for -damages for the obstruction of a street leading to plaintiffs factory, the plaintiff cannot recover the amount of demurrage charges on a car load of lumber which could not be hauled to the factory, in the absence of any evidence of an attempt to minimize the damages by the removal and storage of the lumber, or of the reasonable expense of such storage.</p> <p>Damages — Evidence—Sufficiency. In such an action, plaintiff cannot recover for “overhead” charges, consisting of the salaries of employees, while the factory was closed down, where it appears that they were engaged in the performance of duties of some benefit to the plaintiff and the evidence -did not segregate items which were not a loss, and there was no proof of loss of business or profits.</p>

Judges: Main

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.