Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 6/10/1992

SPM Corp. v. M/V Ming Moon

Citations

  • 965 F.2d 1297
  • 1992 WL 123353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a bill of lading with ambiguous liability-limitation provisions should be construed against the carrier
  • holding that restowage at intermediate ports is customary in the maritime industry and therefore does not constitute a deviation from the contract of carnage
  • holding that a bill of lading with ambiguous liability-limitation provisions should be construed against the carrier
  • holding that a bill of lading with ambiguous liability-limitation provisions should be construed against the carrier
  • \We agree with our sister circuits that the doctrine of quasi-deviation should not be viewed expansively in the post-COGSA era.\
  • “We agree with our sister circuits that the doctrine of quasi-deviation should not be viewed expansively in the post-COGSA era.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Cowen, Garth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named SPM Corp. v. M/V Ming Moon

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.