Skip to main content
· 1/15/1856

Splawn v. Martin

Citations

  • 17 Ark. 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • arguing that the ‘substantial chance’ test is more appropriate in pre-award cases in which bids have been submitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Enomsh, Hanly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.