Spivey v. Rodgers

Citations

• 114 Miss. 639
• 75 So. 444

Syllabus

<p>1. Attorney and Client. Recovery of money collected for client. Pleadings sufficiency.</p> <p>Tbe pleadings in tbis case, as set out in tbe opinion of the court while inartistically drawn were held to be a substantial compliance with the requirements of section 225, Code 1906, and constituted a summary motion against tbe attorney to pay over money collected for bis client; and that tbe defendant in the lower court should have been required to answer the motion and show why tbe remedy afforded by tbe statute in such case should not be invoked against him.</p>