Spitz v. Coughlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant because “[a] corporation may have successor liability” for “injuries caused by defective products manufactured by its predecessor” under the four traditional exceptions
• reversing a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant because \[a] corporation may have successor liability\ for \injuries caused by defective products manufactured by its predecessor\ under the four traditional exceptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).