Skip to main content
· 4/25/2007

Spirit Partners, LP v. Stoel Rives LLP

Citations

  • 157 P.3d 1194
  • 212 Or. App. 295
  • 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty claims are governed by the two-year limitations period in O.R.S. § 12.1110(1)
  • “The threshold question in a choice-of-law problem is whether the laws of the different states actually conflict.”
  • “We apply the ‘most significant relationship’ approach of the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws (1971) to tort claims.”
  • court is not obligated to conduct a conflict-of-law analysis in the absence of express identification of material differences between Oregon law and the law of the proposed alternative forum
  • argument that the law of an alternative forum might govern the parties’ dispute triggers no duty in the court to conduct a conflict-of-law analysis in the absence of express identification of material differences between Oregon law and that of the alternative forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Landau, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.