Spirit Locker, Inc. v. Evo Direct, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss unjust enrichment claim premised on defendant’s retention of monies pursuant to purportedly invalid liquidated damages provision
• declining to dismiss unjust enrichment claim where contract did not cover subject of unjust enrichment claim
• declining to dismiss unjust enrichment claim where subject matter was not covered by an enforceable contractual obligation
• declining to dismiss unjust enrichment claim where subject matter was not covered by an enforceable contractual obligation
• declining to dismiss unjust enrichment claim where subject matter was not covered by an enforceable contractual obligation
• merchant could bring unjust enrichment claim against defendant credit card processor challenging contractual ETF as penalty where “deemed ineffective, inapplicable, void, illegal, or unenforceable” (CCAC 4 300

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).