Skip to main content
· 9/25/1978

Spirek v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Citations

  • 382 N.E.2d 111
  • 65 Ill. App. 3d 440
  • 21 Ill. Dec. 817
  • 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 3510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • insurer not entitled to equitable subrogation that contravenes the limitations on subrogation established by the policy
  • “common law concepts of subrogation cannot be employed to create rights of subrogation where the insurance policy provides otherwise”
  • insureds were required, as a condition to receiving their medical payments, to execute subrogation receipts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.