Spira v. Nick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that circumstances constituting fraud were stated with sufficient particularity and holding that Rule 9(b
• requirement of agreement to commit at least two acts of racketeering activity satisfied by conscious adherence to fraudulent scheme pursuant to which two mailings in furtherance of scheme were foreseeable
• “Notice periods may vary, but numerous courts around the country have authorized ninety day opt-in periods for collective actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).