· 12/31/1969
Spino v. Department of Labor & Industries
Citations
- 463 P.2d 256
- 1 Wash. App. 730
- 1969 Wash. App. LEXIS 395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An assignment of error which is not argued in the brief is deemed to have been abandoned.”
- court did not consider the assignment of error because the assignment of error was not argued in the brief and was thus abandoned
- court did not consider the assignment of error because the assignment of error was not argued in the brief and was thus abandoned
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.