Spinks v. Georgia Quincy Granite Co.
Citations
- 114 La. 1044
- 38 So. 824
- 1905 La. LEXIS 588
Syllabus
<p>AGENCY — FIXED TERM — REVOCATION—BIGHT TO COMMISSIONS.</p> <p>1. An agency for a fixed period, where it is stipulated that the agent shall receive commissions for his services, is in the nature of a contract of letting and hiring.</p> <p>2. The revocation of such a mandate, if permissible, can have no legal effect between the parties until notified to the agent; and alleged want of due diligence, not complained of or acted upon during the period of employment, is no defense against his claim for commissions.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, although ALJ gave “partial” weight to “the only medical opinion evidence of record,” the ALJ’s rejection of the opinion in relevant part meant that the ALJ’s RFC assessment was “not supported by substantial evidence”
- holding that, although ALJ gave “partial” weight to “the only medical opinion evidence of record,” the ALJ’s rejection of the opinion in relevant part meant that the ALJ’s RFC assessment was “not supported by substantial evidence”
- holding that, although ALJ gave “partial” weight to “the only medical opinion evidence of record,” the ALJ’s rejection of the opinion in relevant part meant that the ALJ’s RFC assessment was “not supported by substantial evidence”
- holding that, although ALJ gave “partial” weight to “the only medical opinion evidence of record,” the ALJ’s rejection of the opinion in relevant part meant that the ALJ’s RFC assessment was “not supported by substantial evidence”
- holding that, although ALJ gave “partial” weight to “the only medical opinion evidence of record,” the ALJ’s rejection of the opinion in relevant part meant that the ALJ’s RFC assessment was “not supported by substantial evidence”
- holding that, although ALJ gave “partial” weight to “the only medical opinion evidence of record,” the ALJ’s rejection of the assessment in relevant part “based upon the ALJ’s own lay interpretation of raw medical data” was “not supported by substantial evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Land
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.