Spilsbury v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “ ‘current educational placement’ is the student’s placement before the proposed change”
• explaining that “the IDEA clearly intends ‘current educational placement’ to encompass the whole range of services that a child needs” and that the term “cannot be read to only indicate which physical school building a child attends”
• explaining that “the IDEA clearly intends ‘current educational placement’ to encompass the whole range of services that a child needs” and that the term “cannot be read to only indicate which physical school building a child attends”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).