Spilman v. Geiger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party waives a challenge to a local government’s deci- sion when that challenge “could have been raised, but was not raised,” in a party’s appeal to LUBA
• explaining that “[t]he fact that the same lim- itation was applied through a different mechanism” did not alter the waiver analysis
• explaining that “[t]he fact that the same lim- itation was applied through a different mechanism” did not alter the waiver analysis
• holding Cite as 344 Or App 383 (2025) 401 that a party waives a challenge to a local government’s deci- sion when that challenge “could have been raised, but was not raised,” in a party’s appeal to LUBA
• “Because petitioner’s current challenge to the limitation that the county imposed could have been raised, but was not raised, in petitioner’s first appeal in this case, petitioner waived its challenge to that limitation.”
• “Because petitioner’s current challenge to the limitation that the county imposed could have been raised, but was not raised, in petitioner’s first appeal in this case, petitioner waived its challenge to that limitation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).