Skip to main content
· 12/28/1988

Spillis Candela & Partners, Inc. v. CENTRUST SAV. BK.

Citations

  • 535 So. 2d 694
  • 1988 WL 137888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding trial court determination that Dade County Board of Rules and Appeals violated Sunshine Law and invalidating the Board's resulting recommendation
  • county board did not cure its committee's violation of Sunshine Law by perfunctory ratification of committee's report; only full, open hearing would cure problem
  • the Sunshine Law equally binds all members of governmental bodies, be they advisory committee members or elected officials
  • County Board of Rules and Appeals did not cure its committee's violation of Sunshine Law by perfunctory ratification of committee's report; only full, open hearing by Board would have cured problem

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.