· 12/28/1988
Spillis Candela & Partners, Inc. v. CENTRUST SAV. BK.
Citations
- 535 So. 2d 694
- 1988 WL 137888
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding trial court determination that Dade County Board of Rules and Appeals violated Sunshine Law and invalidating the Board's resulting recommendation
- county board did not cure its committee's violation of Sunshine Law by perfunctory ratification of committee's report; only full, open hearing would cure problem
- the Sunshine Law equally binds all members of governmental bodies, be they advisory committee members or elected officials
- County Board of Rules and Appeals did not cure its committee's violation of Sunshine Law by perfunctory ratification of committee's report; only full, open hearing by Board would have cured problem
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.