Spikes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that officer did not have well-founded suspicion to justify stop of vehicle that had not been reported stolen but had only had a subjective hunch or mere suspicion that the vehicle was stolen
• concluding that officer did not have well-founded suspicion to justify stop of vehicle that had not been reported stolen but had only had a subjective hunch or mere suspicion that the vehicle was stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• E.A.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-13· cited 63×
• State v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-19· cited 4×
• EAB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• United States v. Cortez
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
• Tamer v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-03-06· cited 48×
• State v. Pye
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-25· cited 40×
• Graham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-20· cited 8×
• Jenkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-17· cited 8×
• Turner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-29· cited 6×