Spight v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the denial of a motion to suppress based on “prolonged detention” was not an abuse of discretion where appellant gave consent to search with no indication from the patrolman that compliance was required
• noting that the constitutional proscriptions against warrantless searches and seizures do not come into play when a person gives voluntary consent
• noting constitutional proscriptions against warrantless searches and seizures do not come into play when a person gives voluntary consent
• noting constitutional proscriptions against warrantless searches and seizures do not come into play when person gives voluntary consent
• noting constitutional proscriptions against warrantless searches and seizures do not come into play when a person gives voluntary consent
• noting constitutional proscriptions against warrantless searches and seizures do not come into play when person gives voluntary consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).