Spiegelman v. Victory Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing summary judgment in favor of - 50 - the hospital and noting that the “plaintiff had complained of dizziness and problems with her vision, and there was evidence that plaintiff’s condition rapidly worsened”
• reversing summary judgment in favor of - 50 - the hospital and noting that the “plaintiff had complained of dizziness and problems with her vision, and there was evidence that plaintiff’s condition rapidly worsened”
• “[T]he consent utilized a multipart format and contained various provisions unrelated to the independent contractor disclaimer.”
• court denied motion to transfer venue on forum non conveniens grounds because relevant factors did not favor the transfer
• “[T]he consent utilized a multipart format and contained various provisions unrelated to the independent contractor disclaimer.”
• hospital misapplied the detrimental reliance element which has a limited application in the medical malpractice context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).