Spiegel v. Sharp Electronics Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the alleged knowledge of defendant that the copiers would be resold to ultimate purchasers” was a “legally insufficient” basis for finding that plaintiff was to third-party beneficiary status
• \No [agency] relationship exists between a supplier and a retailer which simply and only sells merchandise bearing the supplier's brand name\
• \No [agency] relationship exists between a supplier and a retailer which simply and only sells merchandise bearing the supplier's brand name\
• “law of Illinois is that third-party beneficiary status may only be conferred where the identification of the third party to be benefited is clear and the benefit to him is direct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).