Spickler v. Greenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff's “personal knowledge” did not rise above the level of mere speculation, in part because the plaintiff’s affidavit did not reveal how he learned of the alleged wrongdoing
• noting that conclusory statements are inappropriate in affidavits
• noting that conclusory statements are inappropriate in affidavits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).