Skip to main content

Spicer v. State

Citations

  • 615 So. 2d 725
  • 1993 WL 33807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statute relating to robbery with a mask provides for an enhanced penalty but does not reclassify offense for purposes of habitual offender sentencing
  • reversing reclassification of robbery with a mask conviction because “[p]enal statutes must be construed in terms of their literal meaning .... [I]f the legislature had intended section 775.0845 [Florida Statutes (1989

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.