Speyer v. Barry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “courts choose the specific statute over the general one only if the two cannot be harmonized, and not otherwise”
• explaining that “courts choose the specific statute over the general one only if the two cannot be harmonized, and not otherwise”
• \appellate courts are not equipped for fact-finding\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).