Sperry v. Willard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of class 17 certification where plaintiffs did not rely solely on challenged policy language but, rather, 18 on the “combination of [death benefit] illustration, policy design, annual statements[,] 19 agent training, and marketing materials”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).