Skip to main content
· 1/21/1913

Sperry v. Stennick

Citations

  • 64 Or. 96
  • 129 P. 130
  • 1913 Ore. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “interpretative process forbids importing limitations from the specification into the defining language of the claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mooee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.