Sperry v. Crompton Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the connection between the purchaser of tires and the producers of chemicals used in the rubbermaking process is simply too attenuated to support” the purchaser’s claim of unjust enrichment
• holding that the court below had properly dismissed the plaintiffs’ Donnelly Act class action as barred by CPLR § 901(b)
• concluding that “the connection between the purchaser of tires and the producers of chemicals used in the rubber-making process is simply too attenuated to support” an unjust enrichment claim
• holding that “the connection between the purchaser of tires and the producers of chemicals used in the rubbermaking process is simply too attenuated to support” the purchaser’s claim of unjust enrichment
• concluding that “the connection between the purchaser of tires and the producers of chemicals used in the rubber-making process is simply too attenuated to support” an unjust enrichment claim
• holding that “the connection between the purchaser of tires and the producers of chemicals used in the rubber- making process is simply too attenuated to support” the pur- chaser’s claim of unjust enrichment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).