Spengler v. ST. FARM FIRE & CAS. CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding intentional act exclusion for bodily injury did not apply to exclude coverage where homeowner shot putative burglar who ultimately turned out to be his date because harm was not intended to the date
• intentional harm exclusion did not apply where insured's intent to harm was not directed against person actually suffering harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).