Spencer, White & Prentis Incorporated of Connecticut v. Pfizer Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “justification for severance is not confined to misjoinder of parties”
• recognizing that “justification for severance is not confined to misjoinder of parties”
• noting that the “justification for severance is not confined to misjoinder of parties.”
• fact that counter claim is compulsory does not per se preclude its severance
• “[J]ustification for severance is not confined to misjoinder of parties.”
• “[J]ustification for severance is not confined to misjoinder of parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).