Spencer v. Sutterfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n in-court identification may be admissible, despite prior illegality relating to a line-up, so long as there is an independent source for the identification. United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 241–42, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).