District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/20/1972
Spencer v. State
Citations
- 263 So. 2d 282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the state is responsible for its agent’s “inducing conduct” even if the police are unaware of the conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spector
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Larry HayesTenth Circuit· 1973-06-04· cited 39×
- State v. BriderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-18· cited 17×
- State v. SokosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-19· cited 14×
- State v. LiptakSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-04-04· cited 13×
- Bauer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-18· cited 9×
- Flam v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-17· cited 5×
- Belote v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-03-31· cited 4×
- State v. EichelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-17· cited 4×
- Kimmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-10· cited 3×
- Crayton v. StateMiami-Dade County Circuit Court· 1977-07-13
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-10-12
- State v. BanksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-18
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Joseph Anthony Accardi, Stephen Morales and Herman John Doming v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1958-08-27· cited 55×
- Stanford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-02-25· cited 25×
- Lashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-10-20· cited 23×
- Liptak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-01-11· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.