· 10/15/1883
Spencer v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
Citations
- 79 Mo. 500
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court’s ruling allowing the State to introduce previously excluded evidence of the defendant’s arrest to explain references in defense’s opening statement
- addressing defendant’s due process argument as evidentiary argument only where defendant failed to specifically raise issue as constitutional matter to trial court
- consolidating charges regarding assault in Durham against one woman and assault in Dover against another woman
- once defendant opened the door, evidence of defendant’s subsequent burglary arrest admitted at sexual assault trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ewing, Martin, Philips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.