Spencer v. O'Neill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding conclusory allegations that the plaintiff’s property “will be damaged” insufficient to invoke the rule of reason
• “[T]he language creating a servitude should be interpreted to carry out the parties’ intentions and the purposes of the servitude.”
• although the deed allowed the easement to be used “at all times and for all purposes,” we may determine “whether a particular use of an easement would create an unreasonable burden”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).