Spencer v. Geissman
Citations
- 37 Cal. 96
Syllabus
<p>Homestead Right.—If a party acquires a homestead right in a tract of land, and subsequently is evicted under a judgment from the part of the tract on which he lived, ho may move on the other part, and hold it under the homestead law.</p> <p>What may be held as Homestead.—A party having a naked possession only of land, the title being in a stranger, may acquire a homestead right thereto, as to everybody but the owner, and such homestead right will, he exempt from forced sale on execution or on any final process for any debt.</p> <p>Idem.—The homestead right does not depend upon the character of the title held by the party claiming it. Whatever title he may have is protected from forced sale.</p>
Judges: Sawyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-08-20· cited 54×
- Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-03-23· cited 38×
- King v. GotzCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-07-28· cited 29×
- Kaser v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1881-01-11· cited 24×
- Blackburn v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-01-15· cited 21×
- Arighi v. Rule & Sons, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1940-12-09· cited 14×
- First National Bank v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1882-07-27· cited 10×
- Turner v. BrowningsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1908-02-05· cited 10×
- Gaylord v. PlaceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-06-07· cited 9×
- Watterson v. E. L. Bonner Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1897-05-24· cited 6×
- Sox v. MiracleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1916-12-02· cited 5×
- Hihn v. ShelbyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-12-08
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.