Skip to main content
· 6/18/2008

Spencer v. Connecticut

Citations

  • 560 F. Supp. 2d 153
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47312
  • 2008 WL 2444551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “so long as the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the search, a claim for an illegal search accrues, and a plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action, when the act of searching the property is complete”
  • finding probable cause where, “[djuring a ‘controlled delivery,’ the Plaintiff, in full view of the police, accepted, took possession of, and placed in his residence a parcel containing a significant amount of marijuana” (emphasis added)
  • “Under Connecticut law, ‘[n]o action founded upon a tort shall be brought but within three years from the date of the act or omission complained of.’”
  • “Section 52–577 governs claims pursuant to the Connecticut Constitution and state common law.”
  • “[S]o long as the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the search, a claim for an illegal search accrues, and a plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action, when the act of searching the property is complete.”
  • stating the relevant limitations periods for IIED and NIED

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dominic J. Squatrito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.