Spencer v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaching the issue of SRO immunity “[b]ecause we agree with the district court that it had subject matter jurisdiction”
• rejecting argument that plaintiff had failed to state a market manipulation claim where trading activity was conducted by third parties rather than defendants themselves
• accepting as true, at the pleading stage, that \the [E]xchanges failed to disclose or omitted material facts to the investing public concerning these products and services\
• accepting as true, at the pleading stage, that “the [E]xchanges failed to disclose or omitted material facts to the investing public concerning these products and services”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).