Fourth Circuit· 7/26/1988
Spell v. McDaniel
Citations
- 852 F.2d 762
- 1988 WL 76038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that time spent reviewing simple aspects of Fourth Circuit procedure is not properly billed to the client where counsels’ experience was basis for their hourly rate
- recognizing that lack of experience in a particular field can affect the lodestar determination
- explaining that “the burden is on the party seeking the fee award to establish the reasonableness of the hours spent”
- imposing a reduction of the fees awarded when it was “impossible . . . to cull in detail the justified from the unjustified”
- allowing only 420 hours of over 1,400 hours claimed for an appeal
- “We have already observed that it is inappropriate to charge defendants for duplicative endeavors and overkill on the part of newly acquired counsel.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chapman, Phillips, Wilkinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonFourth Circuit· 1994-07-25· cited 223×
- Buffington v. Baltimore CountyFourth Circuit· 1990-07-31· cited 89×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1990-10-15· cited 82×
- Islamic Center of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of Starkville, MississippiFifth Circuit· 1989-06-30· cited 68×
- In Re Great Sweats, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 1990-04-09· cited 38×
- Singleton v. Domino's Pizza, LLCD. Maryland· 2013-10-02· cited 36×
- Boyd v. Coventry Health Care Inc.D. Maryland· 2014-01-31· cited 32×
- Ackerley Communications of Massachusetts, Inc. v. City of SomervilleFirst Circuit· 1990-01-16· cited 25×
- Alexander S. by and Through Bowers v. BoydD. South Carolina· 1995-11-22· cited 24×
- Houghton v. Sipco, Inc.S.D. Iowa· 1993-07-08· cited 21×
- Martin v. MabusS.D. Mississippi· 1990-02-27· cited 16×
- Corral v. Montgomery CountyD. Maryland· 2015-03-09· cited 15×
- Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborCourt of International Trade· 2007-10-15· cited 12×
- Stacy v. StroudS.D. West Virginia· 1993-07-27· cited 11×
- Saleh v. MooreE.D. Virginia· 2000-05-12· cited 11×
- Lilienthal v. City of SuffolkE.D. Virginia· 2004-06-18· cited 11×
- Crump v. United States Dept. of Navy ex rel. MabusE.D. Virginia· 2017-03-27· cited 10×
- Watcher v. Pottsville Area Emergency Medical Service, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-04-28· cited 9×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. FreemanD. Maryland· 2015-09-03· cited 9×
- Wolfe v. RoutzahnD. Maryland· 2013-06-20· cited 8×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 7,642×
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1974-01-21· cited 3,561×
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 955×
- Spell v. McDanielFourth Circuit· 1987-07-24· cited 799×
- Ramos v. LammTenth Circuit· 1983-06-15· cited 753×
- Northcross v. Board of EducationSixth Circuit· 1979-11-23· cited 308×
- Daly v. HillFourth Circuit· 1986-04-21· cited 243×
- Robins v. HarumNinth Circuit· 1985-10-03· cited 128×
- Jean Hart as Administratrix of the Estate of Levi Hart v. Richard W. Bourque, Jr.First Circuit· 1986-08-12· cited 56×
- Spell v. McDanielE.D. North Carolina· 1985-07-10· cited 32×
- Eddie Mitchell Tasby v. Dr. Nolan Estes, General Superintendent, Dallas Independent School DistrictFifth Circuit· 1981-07-17· cited 24×
- Sotomura v. County of HawaiiNinth Circuit· 1982-06-07· cited 9×
- Sun Publishing Co. v. Mecklenburg News, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1987-07-20· cited 9×
- Hickman v. Valley Local School District Board of EducationS.D. Ohio· 1981-04-08· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.