Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 7/26/1988

Spell v. McDaniel

Citations

  • 852 F.2d 762
  • 1988 WL 76038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that time spent reviewing simple aspects of Fourth Circuit procedure is not properly billed to the client where counsels’ experience was basis for their hourly rate
  • recognizing that lack of experience in a particular field can affect the lodestar determination
  • explaining that “the burden is on the party seeking the fee award to establish the reasonableness of the hours spent”
  • imposing a reduction of the fees awarded when it was “impossible . . . to cull in detail the justified from the unjustified”
  • allowing only 420 hours of over 1,400 hours claimed for an appeal
  • “We have already observed that it is inappropriate to charge defendants for duplicative endeavors and overkill on the part of newly acquired counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapman, Phillips, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.