Speights v. Bue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[a]llowing uneven application of nationwide immigration policy flies in the face of” the “need for uniformity”
• noting that \challenges to individual 'no deferred action' decisions ... fall exactly within Section 1252(g) as interpreted by the Court in [ AAADC ]\
• holding DACA’s rescission is not a binding rule of substantive law
• affirming nationwide injunction against the government's rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program based in part on \the need for uniformity in immigration policy\
• affirming the District Court's denial of the Government's motion to dismiss
• “Allowing uneven application of nationwide immigration policy flies in the face of [uniformity] requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).