Speiden v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing ORS 138.050 as “prohibiting] * * * a defendant’s challenge to a conviction— as opposed to a sentence — when the defendant has pleaded guilty”
• where the defendant had pleaded guilty to felonies, this court lacked jurisdiction to address an argument that was, “in effect, a challenge to defendant’s conviction”
• ORS 138.050(1) prohibits “a defendant’s challenge to a conviction — as opposed to a sentence — when the defendant has pleaded guilty”
• ORS 138.050 “carries] weight when the appeal in a felony case is not based on the sentence”
• “[T]he phrase ‘based on the sentence’ in ORS 138.222(7) was intended to limit an appeal by a defendant who pleads guilty to a felony to assignments of error concerning either the terms of the sentence or procedural or legal errors bearing directly on the terms of the sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).