Speeter v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e conclude that any error in excluding the evidence did not substantially prejudice petitioner and is not, for that reason, a basis for reversal.”
• \The relevance of evidence is a legal question that we review for errors of law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).