· 10/13/1888
Speer v. State
Citations
- 26 Tex. Ct. App. 173
- 9 S.W. 358
- 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 175
Syllabus
<p>1. Theft—Evidence—Continuance.—See the statement of the case for the substance of absent testimony set out in an application for continuance held material to the defense, and probably true. Wherefore the refusal of the continuance and of a new trial was error.</p> <p>2. Practice in this Court.—The innocence of the appellants havingheen clearly demonstrated since their conviction, this court, as an act of justice to them, states that fact.</p>
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.