Skip to main content
· 12/29/2005

Speedy Messenger & Delivery Service v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Citations

  • 129 P.3d 1094
  • 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 2140
  • 2005 WL 3544115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that two workers performing the services at issue did not advertise or have business cards
  • putative employer \may produce a written document that satisfies all the applicable factors set forth in [section] 8-70-115(1)(c)\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russel, Roy, Carparelli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.