Speedry Chemical Products, Inc. And Sidney Rosenthal v. The Carter's Ink Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying existence of a trade secret where information was “the result of [defendant’s] own research and experimentation”
• noting the information must not be “of general knowledge in an industry”
• “[mjatters of ... general knowledge in an industry cannot be appropriated by one as his secret” (internal citation omitted)
• “Matters of public knowledge or of general knowledge in an industry cannot be appropriated by one as [trade] secret.”
• The information must not be “of general knowledge in an industry.”
• “An exact definition of a trade secret is not possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).