Skip to main content
· 6/18/1985

Spectrum Leasing Corporation v. United States of America

Citations

  • 764 F.2d 891
  • 246 U.S. App. D.C. 258
  • 32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,658
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a claim was essentially contractual in part because the relief sought amounted to “the classic contractual remedy of specific performance”
  • noting that “there are certain policy considerations that militate in favor of the judgment that we reach on the jurisdictional question”
  • concluding a claim was essentially contractual in part because the relief sought amounted to “the classic contractual remedy of specific performance”
  • concluding a claim was essentially contractual in part because the relief sought amounted to “the classic contractual remedy of specific performance”
  • concluding a claim was essentially contractual in part because the relief sought amounted to “the classic contractual remedy of specific performance”
  • finding that Spectrum’s requested relief was contractual in nature even though the company also requested a declaration that the government had violated the Debt Collector Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, Bork, McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.